Talk:CNVC LT - Revision history

John Abbe: Request for clarity LT - GCC - Board

2007-04-15T19:08:13Z

Request for clarity LT - GCC - Board

John Abbe: Request for clarity LT - GCC - Board

2007-04-15T19:08:02Z

Request for clarity LT - GCC - Board

Dieudo: Title "Feedback received from folks in the network"

2007-03-12T09:42:48Z

Title "Feedback received from folks in the network"

Jm4nvc at 01:59, 12 March 2007

2007-03-12T01:59:06Z

Dieudo: /* Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... */

2007-01-06T15:04:32Z

‎Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets...

Jimmanske: /* Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... */

2007-01-05T19:30:56Z

‎Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets...

Dieudo: /* Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... */ About the power of gift

2006-11-01T13:22:03Z

‎Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets...: About the power of gift

Dieudo: /* Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... */

2006-11-01T10:19:46Z

‎Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets...

Dieudo: Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets...

2006-11-01T09:56:56Z

Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets...

Jw4nvc: Talk:CNVC GCC moved to Talk:CNVC LT: Global Coordinating Circle renamed to Leadership Team

2006-10-26T01:31:56Z

Talk:CNVC GCC moved to Talk:CNVC LT: Global Coordinating Circle renamed to Leadership Team

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 15 April 2007
Line 181:		Line 181:
	----		----

−	I am wondering who is on the [[[CNVC LT]], the [[CNVC GCC]], and the [[CNVC Board]], and how they all relate to each other. I thought at one point that the GCC would become the new board - is that still the plan? I have looked around on the wiki and see no explanations. Would anyone be willing to point me to a page that explains all this, or write an explanation as relevant to the topof those three pages? Also, it would be helpful if each page listed who the current members are, and when there terms (if any) end. --[[User:John Abbe\|John Abbe]] 21:08, 15 April 2007 (CEST)	+	I am wondering who is on the [[CNVC LT]], the [[CNVC GCC]], and the [[CNVC Board]], and how they all relate to each other. I thought at one point that the GCC would become the new board - is that still the plan? I have looked around on the wiki and see no explanations. Would anyone be willing to point me to a page that explains all this, or write an explanation as relevant to the topof those three pages? Also, it would be helpful if each page listed who the current members are, and when there terms (if any) end. --[[User:John Abbe\|John Abbe]] 21:08, 15 April 2007 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 15 April 2007
Line 178:		Line 178:

	:Thank you Jim :-) --[[User:Dieudo\|DieudonnÃ©]] 16:04, 6 January 2007 (CET)		:Thank you Jim :-) --[[User:Dieudo\|DieudonnÃ©]] 16:04, 6 January 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	I am wondering who is on the [[[CNVC LT]], the [[CNVC GCC]], and the [[CNVC Board]], and how they all relate to each other. I thought at one point that the GCC would become the new board - is that still the plan? I have looked around on the wiki and see no explanations. Would anyone be willing to point me to a page that explains all this, or write an explanation as relevant to the topof those three pages? Also, it would be helpful if each page listed who the current members are, and when there terms (if any) end. --[[User:John Abbe\|John Abbe]] 21:08, 15 April 2007 (CEST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This area is for Public Discussion of the protected CNVC Board document drafting area.  To comment on a specific item, click "article" above to return to the main Board page and click on the topic there that you wish to discuss. Each topic has a "Talk" area for public comment, which you access by clicking on "discussion" at the top of that page.
-____
 *I am adding a thread here concerning feedback received from folks in the network about the proposal to move CNVC to Albuquerque.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 12 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This area is for Public Discussion of the protected CNVC Board document drafting area. To comment on a specific item, click "article" above to return to the main Board page and click on the topic there that you wish to discuss. Each topic has a "Talk" area for public comment, which you access by clicking on "discussion" at the top of that page.		This area is for Public Discussion of the protected CNVC Board document drafting area. To comment on a specific item, click "article" above to return to the main Board page and click on the topic there that you wish to discuss. Each topic has a "Talk" area for public comment, which you access by clicking on "discussion" at the top of that page.
		+	____
		+	*I am adding a thread here concerning feedback received from folks in the network about the proposal to move CNVC to Albuquerque.
		+
		+	Hello Jim,
		+
		+	My name is Martha Young and I am a former CNVC Board Member and trainer pursuing certification. I am also a management consultant who specializes in organizational effectiveness. When I was on the Board I argued that the CNVC office should be in a location which would meet the following criteria:
		+
		+	1. Near network of other organizations that work on peacemaking and conflict resolution so that we can collaborate
		+
		+	2. Near organizations that may give grants to NVC
		+
		+	3. In a large metropolitan area whose time zone would be more conducive to accomodating contact and connection with more of the world network.
		+
		+	4. In a country where there is already a critical mass of trainers
		+
		+	I suggest moving the headquarters to 1. Washington, DC, 2. London, 3. Berlin.
		+
		+	New Mexico does not seem to meet the criteria that I would consider important for a strategice move.
		+
		+	I wanted to let you know my opinion to meet needs for information from the network which I believe you are seeking from your email.
		+
		+	Martha Young
		+
		+	This is Jim's response:
		+
		+	I feel pleased to receive your feedback, grateful that you continue
		+	to express your care for the well-being of CNVC and our mission!
		+
		+	Although moving to NM may not meet the criteria you outline, i sense
		+	(and hope) that moving there will contribute to nudging CNVC towards
		+	fulfilling some of its needs.
		+
		+	Recently in Albuquerque, The Board and LT spent some time
		+	brainstorming some next steps beyond this initial next step to New
		+	Mexico. With you permission, I would like to include your feedback
		+	on the discussion area for the LT on our wiki. Would you have any
		+	objection to that?
		+
		+	I have also made a few responses below:
		+
		+	Warmly,
		+
		+	jim
		+
		+
		+
		+	*1. Near network of other organizations that work on peacemaking and
		+	conflict resolution so that we can collaborate
		+	**Several organizations like that have a presence in NM, including
		+	Bread for the World, Stop the War Machine, the Los Alamos Study Group
		+	and others. New Mexico is also the state closest to having a Cabinet
		+	level Department of Peace and has a long and rich tradition of
		+	liberal politics. Conflict resolution skills permeate much of the
		+	educational infrastructure from Albuquerque Public Schools (APS) to
		+	the University of New Mexico, even Sandia and Los Alamos National
		+	Labs. NVC has a presence in both UNM and APS.
		+	*2. Near organizations that may give grants to NVC
		+	*Again, there are some organizations in NM that we hope to collaborate
		+	with, including Ted Turner (the largest land owner in NM and a peace
		+	activist), The Santa Fe Institute, the UNM Dept of Peace Studies, The
		+	National Labs, and some Foundations that have been supportive of
		+	peace and dialogue projects.
		+	*3. In a large metropolitan area whose time zone would be more conducive to accomodating contact and connection with more of the
		+	world network.
		+	**At least NM is one time zone closer to civilization than LA! NM is
		+	also the "call center" capitol of the world and has a cornucopia of
		+	trained people hungry to offer such services 24/7.
		+	Also, Albuquerque has recently been selected as #1 by Forbes magazine
		+	as a place conducive to doing business.
		+	*4. In a country where there is already a critical mass of trainers
		+	**The trainer base in the US is among the strongest, in my opinion.
		+	And we still have a long way to go, since we do not yet have a
		+	trainer in every state. New Mexico is blessed with 5 certified
		+	trainers, plus Marshall and Valentina, with a half dozen registered
		+	candidates and a growing network of practice groups throughout the
		+	state.
		+	* I suggest moving the headquarters to 1. Washington, DC, 2. London,3. Berlin.
		+	**I would enjoy seeing regional offices in at least 6 zones within ten
		+	years to match the circles being created by the GCC: English
		+	speaking-Western (North America, Western Europe); English Speaking
		+	Other (Eastern Europe); German, French, and Spanish/Portuguese; and
		+	Asia/Oceania.
		+
		+	**i wonder how you feel now, reading the observations and opinions above?
		+
		+
		+	Again, I feel so grateful for you contribution!
		+
		+	Peace,
		+
		+	jim
		+

	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 6 January 2007
Line 82:		Line 82:

	-Jim Manske, GCC		-Jim Manske, GCC
		+
		+	:Thank you Jim :-) --[[User:Dieudo\|DieudonnÃ©]] 16:04, 6 January 2007 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 5 January 2007
Line 76:		Line 76:

	from Mexico, thank you again for sharing all this through this wiki, --[[User:Dieudo\|DieudonnÃ©]] 10:56, 1 November 2006 (CET)		from Mexico, thank you again for sharing all this through this wiki, --[[User:Dieudo\|DieudonnÃ©]] 10:56, 1 November 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	Dieudo,
		+
		+	I for one like the idea of using "viral marketing" to get the word out about NVC. Soon, I hope the LT will have a Media leader who can begin to explore options for reaching millions as effectively as possible!
		+
		+	-Jim Manske, GCC

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 1 November 2006
Line 62:		Line 62:

	== Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... ==		== Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... ==
		+
		+	[[Image:Free hugs campaign.jpg\|thumb\|[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr3x_RRJdd4 About the power of gift<br>...Imagine all the people...]]]

	Thank you [[user:jw4nvc\|John]] for keeping us informed of what is happening in the LT ( ''Love Team'' ;-) ).		Thank you [[user:jw4nvc\|John]] for keeping us informed of what is happening in the LT ( ''Love Team'' ;-) ).

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 So that's why I'm asking it to you :
-* do you think, when Marshall and Valentina talk about ''â€œreaching millions of people through mainstream media outletsâ€'', they are also talking about '''being reached''' by the creativity one can expect of people, when you come to them with a gift ?
+* do you think, when [[CNVC_LT#Statement_to_the_NVC_network_from_Marshall|Marshall and Valentina talk about ''â€œreaching millions of people through mainstream media outletsâ€'']], they are also talking about '''being reached''' by the creativity one can expect of people, when you come to them with a gift ?
 * in other words, do you think they are also talking about sharing NVC through peer to peer, knowing that they are plenty of ways to share creations in a sustainable way (see for example [http://www.eff.org/share/compensation.php Making P2P Pay Artists]) ?
 from Mexico, thank you again for sharing all this through this wiki, --[[User:Dieudo|DieudonnÃ©]] 10:56, 1 November 2006 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:56, 1 November 2006
Line 60:		Line 60:

	:In the hope it will make this dialog easier to read I've turned on my JavaScript just now to make it easier for me to sign this with my username and date. I can just click on the second-to-last icon on the toolbar at the top of this edit window, and it automatically inserts the <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> code for my signature with timestamp. --[[User:Jw4nvc\|John W.]] 22:09, 18 July 2006 (CEST)		:In the hope it will make this dialog easier to read I've turned on my JavaScript just now to make it easier for me to sign this with my username and date. I can just click on the second-to-last icon on the toolbar at the top of this edit window, and it automatically inserts the <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> code for my signature with timestamp. --[[User:Jw4nvc\|John W.]] 22:09, 18 July 2006 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Reaching millions of people through mainstream media outlets... ==
		+
		+	Thank you [[user:jw4nvc\|John]] for keeping us informed of what is happening in the LT ( ''Love Team'' ;-) ).
		+
		+	I don't know anybody better aware of both :
		+	* the beauty and efficiency of NVC, even within the CNVC ;-)
		+	* the beauty and efficiency of the [[Board Proposal: copyleft attitude\|copyleft attitude]], as well in free-libre-open-source software (FLOSS), as in other creations like Wikipedia for example.
		+
		+	So that's why I'm asking it to you :
		+	* do you think, when Marshall and Valentina talk about ''â€œreaching millions of people through mainstream media outletsâ€'', they are also talking about '''being reached''' by the creativity one can expect of people, when you come to them with a gift ?
		+	* in other words, do you think they are also talking about sharing NVC through peer to peer, knowing that they are plenty of ways to share creations in a sustainable way (see for example [http://www.eff.org/share/compensation.php Making P2P Pay Artists]) ?
		+
		+	from Mexico, thank you again for sharing all this through this wiki, --[[User:Dieudo\|DieudonnÃ©]] 10:56, 1 November 2006 (CET)

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:31, 26 October 2006
(No difference)